EGAPP logo

EGAPP logo

Evaluation of Genomic Applications in Practice and Prevention
Working Group

Meetings & Conferences


January 24-25, 2005 ~ Westin Peachtree Plaza Hotel ~ Atlanta, GA

Agenda
Expert Meeting on Evidence-Based Review of Genomic Applications

Monday, January 24
Time
Activity
Moderator
7:30 - 8:00 Continental Breakfast  
8:00 - 8:15 Welcome and Introductions Diane Wagener
8:15 – 8:30

Public Health Assessment of Genomic Applications

Muin Khoury
( View Presentation )
8:30– 8:45

Meeting Goals and Objectives

Diane Wagener
8:45 – 9:00 Comments on current approaches to evaluation and future potential - Tab 3 Linda Bradley
9:00 - 9:30 Components of Evaluation : Describing the Disorder, Test, and Setting - Tab 4 James Haddow
9:30 - 10:30

Components of Evaluation : Analytic Validity (AV) - Tab 5

Glenn Palomaki
10:30–10:45 Break
10:45 - 12:15 Components of Evaluation : Clinical Validity (CV)- Tab 6 Ingeborg Blancquaert

12:15 - 12:30

Break and Buffet - Return for Working Lunch
12:30 - 2:00

Components of Evaluation : Clinical Utility - Tab 7

Steve Teutsch
2:00 - 3:00 Components of Evaluation : Ethical, Legal and Social Implications - Tab 8 Wylie Burke
3:15 - 3:30 Break
3:30 - 4:00 Review and Updating of Reports - Tab 9 Peter Briss
4:00 - 5:00

Day 1 Facilitated Discussion (All attendees)

  • Development of themes/conclusions from the sessions
  • Questions and comments
Diane Wagener

 

Tuesday, January 25
Time
Activity
Moderator
8:00 - 8:30

Continental Breakfast

8:30 - 10:00

Products and Dissemination of Information - Tab 10

Gurvaneet Randhava
10:00 - 10:15 Break
10:15 - 12:15

Facilitated Discussion (All attendees)

  • Review of themes and conclusions
  • Areas of agreement
  • Compatibility with current standards of practice?
  • How can we facilitate/support the development of research agendas based on identified gaps in evidence?
  • Is there any consensus on 5-10 topics that would be high priority for review?
Al Berg
12:15 - 12:30

Summary of Meeting/Closing Remarks

  • Elicit suggestions for other professionals to involve as advisors, content experts, or peer-reviewers
  • Request for information about relevant studies currently being conducted (PI, contact information, and project description)
  • Closing thoughts and solicitation of opinion from participants on the desired outcome from this meeting
  • Expression of thanks from RTI and CDC for helpful insights and participation
Diane Wagener

Muin Khoury

Linda Bradley