Notice: Function _load_textdomain_just_in_time was called incorrectly. Translation loading for the permalink-manager domain was triggered too early. This is usually an indicator for some code in the plugin or theme running too early. Translations should be loaded at the init action or later. Please see Debugging in WordPress for more information. (This message was added in version 6.7.0.) in /var/www/egappreviews.org/wp-includes/functions.php on line 6260
Working Group: Understanding EGAPP - Evaluation of Genomic Applications in Practice and Prevention (EGAPP)
Categories
Articles

Working Group: Understanding EGAPP

 

Working Group: Understanding EGAPP

 

Steps in the EGAPP Working Group Review Process 

Download PDF PDF icon (460 KB)

Overview   |   Step 1   |   Step 2   |   Step 3   |   Step 4

 

Step 3: Develop Evidence-Based Recommendation Statement

 

Summary: The EGAPP Working Group (EWG) reviews the evidence report, considers contextual issues, and may consider other
sources of evidence. A draft recommendation statement is developed, peer-reviewed, and submitted for publication.

 

EWG Recommendation Statements are based on CDC-commissioned evidence reports, other review of evidence as needed, the quality of available data, and potential clinical and social impact of using the test in practice.

 

Who is involved: EWG, with support from CDC-based EGAPP staff and consultants.

 

Transparency: Review of comments from industry and a range of stakeholders (e.g., from professional organizations, health plans, consumer groups, and public health programs).

 

Products:

  • Peer-reviewed, published EWG Recommendation Statements

 

 

Recommendation Statement Development Process

 

chart


>> See Step 4: Disseminate EGAPP Products & Communicate Informational Messages to Stakeholders

 

Page last updated: July 19, 2010
Page last reviewed: December 23, 2008
Content Source: EGAPP Team