EGAPP Working Group Meeting, January 24-25, 2005
Westin Peachtree Plaza Hotel – Atlanta, GA
AGENDA
View Meeting Summary | View Meeting Participants
Monday, January 24
|
Time
|
Activity
|
Speaker
|
7:30 – 8:00
|
Continental Breakfast |
|
8:00 – 8:15
|
Welcome and Introductions |
Diane Wagener |
8:15 – 8:30
|
Public Health Assessment of Genomic Applications
|
Muin Khoury ( View Presentation ) |
8:30– 8:45
|
Meeting Goals and Objectives
|
Diane Wagener |
8:45 – 9:00
|
Comments on current approaches to evaluation and future potential – Tab 3 |
Linda Bradley |
9:00 – 9:30
|
Components of Evaluation : Describing the Disorder, Test, and Setting – Tab 4 |
James Haddow |
9:30 – 10:30
|
Components of Evaluation : Analytic Validity (AV) – Tab 5
|
Glenn Palomaki |
10:30–10:45
|
Break |
|
10:45 – 12:15
|
Components of Evaluation : Clinical Validity (CV)- Tab 6 |
Ingeborg Blancquaert |
12:15 – 12:30
|
Break and Buffet – Return for Working Lunch |
|
12:30 – 2:00
|
Components of Evaluation : Clinical Utility – Tab 7
|
Steve Teutsch |
2:00 – 3:00
|
Components of Evaluation : Ethical, Legal and Social Implications – Tab 8 |
Wylie Burke |
3:15 – 3:30
|
Break |
|
3:30 – 4:00
|
Review and Updating of Reports – Tab 9 |
Peter Briss |
4:00 – 5:00
|
Day 1 Facilitated Discussion (All attendees)
- Development of themes/conclusions from the sessions
- Questions and comments
|
Diane Wagener |
|
Tuesday, January 25
|
Time
|
Activity
|
Speaker
|
8:00 – 8:30
|
Continental Breakfast
|
|
8:30 – 10:00
|
Products and Dissemination of Information – Tab 10
|
Gurvaneet Randhava |
10:00 – 10:15
|
Break |
|
10:15 – 12:15
|
Facilitated Discussion (All attendees)
- Review of themes and conclusions
- Areas of agreement
- Compatibility with current standards of practice?
- How can we facilitate/support the development of research agendas based on identified gaps in evidence?
- Is there any consensus on 5-10 topics that would be high priority for review?
|
Al Berg |
12:15 – 12:30
|
Summary of Meeting/Closing Remarks
- Elicit suggestions for other professionals to involve as advisors, content experts, or peer-reviewers
- Request for information about relevant studies currently being conducted (PI, contact information, and project description)
- Closing thoughts and solicitation of opinion from participants on the desired outcome from this meeting
- Expression of thanks from RTI and CDC for helpful insights and participation
|
Diane Wagener
Muin Khoury
Linda Bradley
|
|
Historical Document
Page last updated: June 1, 2009
Page last reviewed: December 23, 2008
Content Source: OPHG Staff